- USA - WEST
- San Francisco
- Silicon Valley
- San Diego
- Seattle
- Los Angeles
- North Bay
- Portland
- Hawaii
- Berkeley
- Santa Barbara
- Davis/Sacramento
- Boulder/Denver
- San Francisco
- Salt Lake City
- Phoenix/
Scottsdale - Reno/Tahoe
- Orange County
- USA - EAST
- New York
- Boston
- Washington DC
- Chicago
- Pittsburgh
- Philadelphia
- Louisville
- Houston
- Raleigh
- Vermont
- Austin
- Nashville
- Minneapolis
- Denton, TX
- Dallas
- Albany, NY
- Atlanta
- Huntsville, AL
- Memphis, TN
- Champaign, IL
- Lansing, MI
- Indianapolis
- Southwest Florida
- Grand Rapids, MI
- AFRICA
- Cape Town
- AUSTRALIA
- Sydney
- Melbourne
- SOUTH AMERICA
- Rio de Janeiro
- Buenos Aires
- CANADA
- Toronto
- Vancouver
- Montreal
- Ottawa
- EUROPE
- Amsterdam
- London
- Paris
- Brussels
- Edinburgh
- Spain
- Dublin
- Munich
- Berlin
- Helsinki
- Czech Republic
- Hamburg
- Aachen/Maastricht
- Geneva
- Poland
- Budapest
- Stockholm
- Copenhagen
- Milan
- Stuttgart
- Cologne
- Groningen
- Athens
- Berlin (English)
- Zurich
- Ruhrgebiet
- Oslo
- ASIA
- Tokyo
- Beirut
- Singapore
- Dubai
- Bangkok
- Beijing
- Taiwan
- ShenZhen, China
- Hong Kong
- Seoul
- CITY NOT LISTED?
- Start Your Own
QS Group! Topics
- #qschat (1)
- Conference (32)
- Data and Your Doc (3)
- Discussions (96)
- Group Experiments (5)
- Lab Notes (8)
- Meeting Recaps (62)
- News and Pointers (141)
- Newsletters (3)
- Numbers from Around the Web (13)
- Personal Informatics (17)
- Personal Projects (96)
- QS 101 (8)
- QS Books (6)
- QS Resource (4)
- Tool Roundups (51)
- Toolmaker Talks (17)
- Uncategorized (6)
- Videos (209)
- What We're Reading (19)
Tag Archives: negative implications
When Quantified Self Goes Overboard…
Discuss: The Dark Side of Self-Tracking

“After spending some time playing around with the idea of what it meant to have a ‘primary’ eye, I did the following experiment: I covered it with an eye patch for a day, to see if the ‘secondary’ eye would get stronger. Here’s what happened: I temporarily went blind!”
“I think Stefan raised an interesting point concerning the potential of self-tracking/experimentation to harm the subject. It might be interesting to discuss what negative experiences self-tracking has personally wrought and what we would recommend to make the experience less negative.”
Why I Stopped Tracking
Yes, I did it.
On a crisp Tuesday morning
After 40 measurements a day for 1.5 years
I. Stopped. Tracking.
Why?
When I first wrote about my tracking
People thought I was narcissistic
What they didn’t see
Was
The self-punishment
The fear
The hatred behind the tracking
I had stopped trusting myself
Letting the numbers drown out
My intuition
My instincts
I was afraid
Of not being in control
Of becoming obese like my genetic predecessors
I was addicted
To my iPhone apps
To getting the right numbers
To beating myself up
Each day
My self-worth was tied to the data
One pound heavier this morning?
You’re fat.
2 g too much fat ingested?
You’re out of control.
Skipped a day of running?
You’re lazy.
Didn’t help 10 people today?
You’re selfish.
It felt like being back in school
Less than 100% on an exam?
You’re dumb.
I’m starting to realize
That I need to
Trust
Listen
Accept myself
That I’m more than the numbers
That I’m beautiful, strong, and super smart
I don’t need data to tell me that
And I don’t need to punish myself anymore
Will I ever track again?
Yes, probably
For a specific goal or experiment
Or to observe a pattern
I’ll try to keep an objective, non-judging eye
But then I’ll stop
When I’ve seen what I needed to see
And learned what I wanted to learn
Like any tool
Self-tracking can be used for benefit or harm
I won’t let it
Be an instrument of self-torture
Any. More.





From 










