Which is Better: Automated or Manual?

August 9, 2010

For many of us, the answer seems obvious: why do something manually when you can automate it? But when it comes to personal data, automation involves a trade-off. As Project HealthDesign‘s principal investigator Anind K. Dey points out in this blog post, automation suffers from the drawback of “out of sight, out of mind.” (Dey is referencing work by QS contributor Ian Li, especially his “Mobile Impact” project.)

The important point of Dey’s post is that if you don’t give any attention to collection, you may not integrate the data into your consciousness in a meaningful way. Manual collection, while more laborious, also provides opportunities for increased self-awareness.

The point of self-tracking is not the data, it’s the meaning; generating meaning is an activity of consciousness. There is a limit to the virtues of passivity.

Related Posts

CGM Show&Tell June 13 2023

Gary Wolf

June 13, 2023

For many of us, the answer seems obvious: why do something manually when you can automate it? But when it comes to personal data, automation involves a trade-off. As Project HealthDesign‘s principal investigator Anind K. Dey points out in this blog post, automation suffers from the drawback of “out of sight, out of mind.” (Dey...

New Show&Tell Event: Tracking Blood Glucose

Gary Wolf

May 31, 2023

Please join us for an hour of short "QS Show&Tell" talks about diet and metabolic discoveries using personal science. This session will focus on minimally invasive blood glucose monitor and meal and activity tracking with Nutrisense.

Astronauts

Gary Wolf

February 23, 2023

We The Scientists, a new book by Amy Dockser Marcus, tells the story of a group of families who force research attention on a rare disease